Yaa Rabbi (O My Lord!) What did I get myself into?! lol
I’m with Holly and Emma – duties call. I step away from here and the comments are all over the place. I love it – keep it up- but don’t expect me to be able to keep up with or respond to each point. These religious threads are getting a lot of views even though only a handful of people are responding to them. I pray they are beneficial to all who read them…aameen!
I’m thinking that we need some type of order here, but that will be difficult because we still keep coming back to the same points and as a Muslim trying to follow the methodology of all of the Prophets of God – then I must keep on pushing Tawheed [the fundamental principle of Islam on which all other principles, rules and pillars are based. The aspect of Tawheed emanates from the Shahada "There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah and Muhammad is His servant and Messenger" . It is this declaration that forms the dividing line between Iman (belief) and Kufr (disbelief).]
before I can fully discuss other issues. Calling to Allaah (ad-Da’wah ilallaah) is the way of the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) and his followers, as Allah, the Most High, says:
Say, O Muhammad (sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam): This is my way, I call to Allaah (i.e to the testification that none has the right to be worshipped except Allaah, alone, with no partner) upon certain knowledge – I, and those who follow me. I declare Allaah free and far removed from all that they associate as partners with Him, and I am free of those who worship anything else along with Him. [Soorah Yoosuf 12:108]
However, I do see that pushing Tawheed to some people – falls on deaf ears. The problem as I see it is that even though Jesus pushed Tawheed to his true followers – the concept of the innovated Trinity has blinded them to the truth. What is the truth? Muslims believe that the truth is evident and clear. Christians believe that truth is what you want to believe based on ‘faith’. Muslims know the Quran is true. Christians accept the Bible as the word of God despite the fact that even Christian Scholars refute the status of the New Testament as an inspired scripture – even comments and footnotes in the various different bible versions show evidence of tampering and fraud, not to mention doubt over who the author of the Gospels are. We have an obvious difference in authority.
So the difference in Christianity and Islam comes down to a difference of authority and appeal to authority. The Christian wants to appeal to the Bible and the Muslim wants to appeal to the Quran. You can not stop by saying: This is true because me book say it is, and somebody else would say something else is true because my book says differently, you can not stop at that point, and the Quran does not. The Christians may point to some words that it is recorded Jesus said and say this proves my point. But the Muslim does not simply open his book and say: No, no the Quran says this, because the Quran does not simply deny something the Bible says and say something else instead. The Quran takes the form of a rebuttal, it is a guidance as the opening says (Huda lil mutakeen). So that for every suggestion that the Christian may say: My Bible say such and such, the Quran will not simply say: No that is not true, it will say: Do they say such and such then ask them such and such. You have for example the Ayah that compares Jesus and Adam. There are those who may say that Jesus must have been God (Son of God) because he had no father. He had a woman who was his mother, but there was no human father. It was God that gave him life, so he must have been God’s son. The Quran reminds the Christian in one short sentence to remember Adam – who was his father ? – and in fact, who was his mother ? He did not have a father either and in fact he did not have a mother, but what does that make him? So that the likeness of Adam is the likeness of Jesus, they were nothing and then they became something; that they worship God.
Quran Invites – Not Demands
So that the Quran does not demand belief – the Quran invites belief, and here is the fundamental difference. It is not simply delivered as: Here is what you are to believe, but throughout the Quran the statements are always: Have you O man thought of such and such, have you considered so and so. It is always an invitation for you to look at the evidence; now what do you believe ?
Special Pleading of the Bible
The citation of the Bible very often takes the form of what is called in Argumentation: Special Pleading. Special Pleading is when implications are not consistent. When you take something and you say: Well that must mean this, but you don’t use the same argument to apply it to something else. To give an example, I have seen it in publications many times, stating that Jesus must have been God because he worked miracles. In other hand we know very well that there is no miracle ever worked by Jesus that is not also recorded in the Old Testament as worked by one of the prophets. You had amongst others, Elijah, who is reported to have cured the leper, raise the dead boy to life and to have multiplied bread for the people to eat – three of the most favourite miracles cited by Jesus. If the miracles worked by Jesus proved he was God, why don’t they prove Elijah was God ? This is Special Pleading, if you see what I mean. The implications are not consistent. If this implies that then in that case it must also imply the same thing. We have those who would say Jesus was God because he was taken up in the heaven. But the Bible also says the a certain Einah did not die he was taken up into the heaven by God. Whether it is true or not, who knows, but the point is if Jesus being taken up proves he is God, why does not it prove Einah was God? The same thing happened to him.
The truth is that the Christians are basing their belief on blind faith and are avoiding the facts. One of the facts that they are ignoring, is that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is a true Messenger of God and that the Quran was revealed to him. We believe that the one who disbelieves in Jesus is not a Muslim, because the person who disbelieves in one the prophets disbelieves in all of them. So Muslims believe in Jesus and in his message. His message was one with all the other messengers. In the Quran, it is said that God never sent a messenger to mankind except that he was sent with one warning: Worship Allâh alone.
Muhammad (pbuh) said:
“I am the most worthy of Jesus son of Mary in this life and in the hereafter.” They (companions) asked: “Why is that O Messenger of Allâh (sala Allâhu ‘alihi was-Salaam)?”
He (sala Allâhu ‘alihi was-Salaam) replied:
“The Prophets are paternal (bloodline) brethren (from fathers side). Their mothers may be different (races, peoples, bloodlines) yet their Deen is always one (Islam).” Reported by Bukhari and Muslim.
Therefore this necessitates that he who disputes the validity of one of the true Prophets and Messengers has in fact reviled and disputed all of them. One cannot believe in Muhammad (pbuh) and not believe in Jesus (pbuh). Equally, one cannot truly believe in Jesus and not believe in Muhammad (pbuh). To truly accept one Prophet or Messenger necessitates the acceptance of all those who came before him and all who will come after him, ending with Muhammad (pbuh).
If you are objective in your readings, you will find the Truth. The Truth is that the Quran is the Book of Allah, the One and Only True God and Creator of all mankind. Muslims cannot be considered as believers unless we confirm that the Bible was originally from Almighty God. So this is not a point of discussion, in that we both agree. However, I highly recommend reading , Bible A Closer Look by Yusuf Estes – Former Christian – Muslim Chaplain
Introduction and Explanation of Purpose of This Research and Presentation
First of all, let me begin by saying that I am a former Christian, preacher, minister of music and organist for a long number of years in the Disciples of Christ Church, Baptist, Methodist churches and The Church of God. I totally and completely accepted the teachings and concepts of salvation within the Christian church many years ago. My parents were very religious and their parents were also very instrumental in building and supporting the work of the church throughout their entire lives. So, it is not my aim to discredit the efforts of those who came before me whatsoever. This is totally the opposite of my purpose in this presentation.
Second, I am still most active in the spreading of the True Word of God as much as HE will allow me to be. I have found that some of the teachings of the translations of the Bible contain errors and mistakes which must be examined and thought through so as to bring about a better understanding for both the Christians and the non-Christians, especially those of the Muslim (Islam) faith.
Third, I am presently an institutional chaplain and I hold the position of Delegate to the United Nations Peace Conference for the World’s Religious Leaders. As such I hold all the leaders of other religions in proper regard and with due respect. Many of my associates and co-workers are from the Catholic, Protestant, Jewish and Hindu faiths.
Therefore, it is not my intention to cause people to loose their belief in God, His divinely-inspired prophets and messengers, or the holy scriptures that they brought. I humbly request all who read and study these pages to be considerate of those who are committed to believe in the scriptures of the Bible and not use this material as a tool for attacking and harming the faiths of others. The opposite is what I request the reader to do. Please take time to learn the materials and then share in a positive light with those whom you honestly feel can handle a discussion on this topic without being confrontational.
May Almighty God guide all of us the all truth, amen.
…
I try to be patient in these discussions but I would be lying if I said that they are not frustrating. I find myself wondering how can people be so blind, deaf, and dumb. Then I remember our (mankinds) open enemy. The one who knows he’s going to hell and has promised to ‘bring down’ as many as possible with him. I then realize how satan has manipulated the Christians!
It is obvious to anyone with reason that Satan has greatly manipulated these misled people (Christians). He called them and they responded to him; he befooled them and they obeyed him.
He manipulated them with regards to Allah, the Exalted and Most High.
He manipulated them with regards to Jesus (peace be upon him).
He manipulated them with regards to the cross and the worship of it.He also manipulated them with regards to making pictures and statues in churches and then worshipping them, so you will not find one of their churches without the picture of Mary and Jesus, saints and other holy individuals and martyrs of theirs. Most of them prostrate to pictures and statues, and pray to them instead to Allah the Most High…
The typical example of what these polytheists are doing is like that of a servant of a king who entered upon a man, so the man jumped from his place, prostrated to the servant, worshipped him, and did to him what he was not supposed to do except to the king. Every rational person would consider him an ignorant and a fool because of what he did, since he did to the king’s servant what he was supposed to do only to the king, in terms of honoring, humbleness and humility.
It is well-known that what the servant did here is more likely to cause the king to hate him and look down upon him than to honor him and exalt his status.
This is the situation of one who prostrates to creation, or a picture of creation. This is because he resorted to prostration which is the greatest means of reaching the Lord’s pleasure. Such an action is not valid except for Allah, so there is no greater repulsiveness or injustice than doing it for a picture or statue of a servant and equalizing between Allah and His servant.
This is why Allah the Most High said,
“Verily, shirk (polytheism, setting up partners with Allah) is a great injustice.” [Luqman: 33] Allah the Most High has created his worshippers prone to recognize ugliness in expressing exaltation, glorification, sumbisiveness and humility towards king’s slaves and servants (as such actions are usually done for the king).
So what is the situation of the one who shows this type of reverence to king’s enemies? For Satan is the enemy of Allah, and the polytheist is in reality setting Satan, not Allah’s prophets and righteous servants¸ as a partner with Allah. For the prophets and righteous servants have nothing to do with those who set them as partners with Allah; they are against them and the strongest in hatred of all people towards them. The polytheists, therefore, are only setting up as partners with Allah His enemies, and equalizing between them and Allah in worship, exaltation, prostration and humility.
This is why the invalidity and ugliness of polytheism is recognized by sound innate nature and reason, and this type of ugliness is recognized more clearly than its other types. [Holly this should answer your question about why Muslims find the concept of God scarificing Himself 'horrible']
The intent here was to mention Satan’s manipulation of these people in both the foundation and branches of their religion.
by Imâm Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah
From “Ighatul-Lahfaan min Masaa`id al-Shaytan” Translalated by Islaam.com
This post was much longer than I intended. I’m sure I still haven’t said all that I would like to convey. If there are any questions that anyone would like to ask about Islam, please use this thread to do so. There are several previous threads that are ‘interfaith’ discussion/debates where we learned about each others belief. I prefer that that not be carried over to this post and I am requesting that all comments be inquiries into Islam or related to Islam only.
Mu’aawiyyah radiallaahu anhu who said:
The Messenger of Allaah sallallaahu alaihi was sallam said, “He who Allaah wants good for He gives him understanding of the religion.”
So if they believe in the like of that which you believe, then they are rightly guided, but if they turn away, then they are only in opposition. So Allâh will suffice you against them. And He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower. (Al-Baqarah (2):137)


Bismillah.
Yay, we are unanimous -I am right with you all there: duties call!! Although I don’t have any kidlings, I have a life too. That’s one of the reasons why I tend to stay away from online discussions of any sort; it is *very* time consuming -takes me away from more beneficial things. Plus I get an achy back from sitting at the pc for so long, lol.
I often find that those who comment in a certain way on different faith blogs are not coming to learn, but to preach. To each his own. That is why you don’t see me going to Jewish/Christian etc blogs and starting discussions. A preacher I am not.
Umm Adam you are absolutely right that Muslims believe in the unadulterated books of the gospel (injeel), the torah (taurat), the psalms (zaboor) etc. Don’t all Christians and Jews know that about us, lol? That Muslims reject those books is one of the many misconceptions about Islam.
Soooo, who are all the blurkers I wonder? lol.
Dawaah requires patience, consistency and good manners.
Dawah apart from verbally explaining to people has its effectivity heavily increased by people seeing that you are qualitatively different, nay not just different, but better than others in your conduct and way.
Firts of all I want to apologize if I gave you the idea that I wanted to preach. I was just trying to explain my point of view.
Second, I want to thank you, Ummadam, Aliyah and Faatih: your last posts show me that what I thougtht was a sincere and welcoming invitation of a Muslim to participate to an conversation (even heated sometime still a conversation) was merrily a way to try to manipulate and judge others (and congratulate yourself).
You know what? That is called self-righteousness. Enjoy it.
Your final comments gave me good reasons NOT to convert to Islam. Thank you.
Bismillah.
*looking puzzled*
Hello again Emma *smile*,
I’m sorry that you feel you were manipulated or being judged.I’m very sorry if you felt that any comment I made was directed at you, because it certainly was not; you seem like a nice person and I’m sure that neither Umm Adam or Faatih meant that either.
No, I wasn’t talking about you or any woman, but to be honest, Daniel did come across a little that way to me. Perhaps he did not mean it, so I will give him the benefit of the doubt. Rather mine was a general statement of those (people who have followed this blog for a while will know that) who in the past have just punched out verse after verse after verse in the comments section of this blog with no regard to ask questions, just to preach. They usually do not return to have a conversation, just to shout out a single message and then jump over to another (Muslim) blog.
May I ask why you feel that you were being manipulated or judged? I have only treated you with respect; and in fact always greeted you with a friendly hello or hi and with a smile. Please tell me how I can improve my manners, because I’m puzzled to how this can be misconstrued as judgmental or manipulative in any way.
Any hospitality and sincerity I display is just that – a sincere welcome. Please accept my apologies if you think that I have wronged you, because I didn’t intend to give you that impression that I have been /judgmental/manipulative/condescending. After all our discussions, I’m a little hurt that you could think that actually, but perhaps I’m just not very good at expressing myself.
As for you saying that you now have good reasons not to convert to Islam, well I’m surprised because I thought your belief in the trinity was unshakable. It does not affect me f(or any Muslim) if you convert to Islam or not, that is between you and your Creator. Muslims only have to explain what Islam is and leave it at that, the rest is up to you.
From observation, I have found that it is important to remember not to get emotional or take things personally when discussing religion (or anything) on the internet, one only ends up getting hurt.
Again, I’m sorry that you feel that you were treated badly here.
As always, respectfully,
Aliyah
I find myself wondering how can people be so blind, deaf, and dumb.–I think similarly, dumb as in mute and unquestioning, but then I try to maintain the notion that peoples’ hearts ARE veiled and let go a bit. I think these conversations have softened me a bit. I did tend to view Chrisitans monolithically even though I know that is incorrect and loathe than anyone think the same about Muslims–No I’m not JUST like Eve the Rapper or Osama, similarly Holly ain’t just like Britney! So the reminders here about differences in practice and beliefs have been good for me. Ultimately I know that only Allah (subhana wa tala) knows what is in each person’s heart, so again I am most concerned about my own first. Thanks for the fodder.
Love and Peace
Emma-I can’t imagine how one would hold firm to a belief system without a degree of self-righteousness. I certainly don’t hink I am holier than thou or anyone else, but I certainly believe my belief is right.Some folks try to approach interfaith dialogues from the position of how much we have in common and I find that quite absurd. The commonalities are interesting in an epistemological sort of way, but then what would be the point of clinging to a specific faith? Some folks will maintain that all belief systems are all right, others will say all systems are all wrong.You and I both believe ourselves are right, so if you meant “self-righteous” in the derogative, please realise that you have that same quality.
salaamat wa aadaab
do visit my blog on quran, tafsir, islam, muslims, etc
please pass around
http://munir123.wordpress.com/
@Emma [Big hug and kiss]
This is why I don’t discuss my beliefs with those closest to me. Someone always gets, hurt, offended, annoyed, or just pissed off. I’ll admit, it’s easier to discuss with strangers on the internet. Not that I want to hurt, offend, annor, or piss off anyone.
It has been my pleasure discussing our beliefs with you over this week. I learned a lot from you, Holly, and Suusanne about the different ways Christians view the ‘God is love’ concept and I witnessed my very first Christian/Catholic dialogue with you and Amber. I am an avid reader and I have a variety of interest and I like a variety of people. I was not manipulating or judging anyone. I did not invite anyone in particular to this blog, everyone found this topic on their own. I also was not congratualating myself. As a matter of fact I admitted my shortcoming when I said that I get frustrated. Not frustrated explainingor discussing…just frustrated that people don’t get it. That is my fault as Faatih pointed out. Faatih was admonishing and reminding me that if I am going to call others to Islam than I need to be patient and have good manners. I believe that was directed to the Muslims not the non-Muslims, so she/he should not have been included in your comment.
Prophet Noah called to his people for over 900 years and only 10 people accepted! Who am I to get frustrated.
The title of this blog post is a verse from the Quran 2:18 it was not to insult but rather to call it like it is – the way Allah explained those who do not acept the facts presented to them. I’m sorry if you find this reason not to accept Islam. However, I would say that if that is your best reason, no matter how rude a Muslim may be (may Allah forgve them) you do not let that keep you from accepting the truth you will only be wronging yourself.
I have noticed that Christians like to make everyone feel warm and fuzzy, this is what I would consider manipulative. I want the truth told to me. I hate it when as a convert born Muslims try to make Islam seem any way you want it to be in order to make you accept it. Chritinity can not stand on it’s own merit and this is why they push the ‘God is love’ and the ‘He died for you’ concepts so that people feel mesmirized by it.
again, no offense intended. Ytou are still more than welcomed to continue your discussion of your beliefs on one of the other post. The comment section is still open. I just wanted one post that was reserved for q and a on Islam.
The sole reason why Christians adopted the belief that Jesus peace be upon him died for their sins/is divine is because of the false concept of the original sin. Although in the Bible, I believe in Ezekiel (did I spell that right) it says that the no man shall be judged/bare the inequities of another.
It is sad that some tend to get offended although we are all discussing our religions and we all believe our religion is the only one accepted by God. Yet to understand one another we ask questions (I’ve asked plenty and received no answer with proofs, merely opinions and feelings) yet nothing is asked about Islam, only statements such as “your Prophet is a false Prophet, anti-Christ, satanic, married a nine year old…” etc etc. Is this good manners? Seriously. We already know what you (all of you who made these statements) think of our Prophet peace be upon him, but is it good manners to verbalise it in this manner and then expect decency and humility in return? I believe the Muslims on this blog have shown plenty of good manners, surely we did not do our best, but I haven’t seen such offensive comments come from us. There are plenty of Muslims if one were to say this to them, ALL discussion would STOP, yet we continued, didn’t we?
This has nothing to with self-righteousness, may Allah save me from arrogance, this has everything to do with discussing the very FUNDAMENTALS of ones’ religion/belief.
Umm Adam,
I meant to say this before bed last night, but my computer was running slowly at the time. I decided to wait ’til morning.
I sincerely appreciate you letting us discuss these spiritual topics on your blog the last several days. As I told Aliyah on another thread (it’s awaiting moderation), I apologize if I came across sarcastic. Tone of voice is hard to convey sometimes, and I was often just answering various points. I truly didn’t intend to come across as mean-spirited or anything like that. I apologize to anyone reading this who felt that way. Like you, I sometimes get frustrated so perhaps I didn’t speak the truth in love every time. I am sorry for that.
Anyway… again, many thanks for your welcoming us here lately! I don’t even remember how it all started, but it was enjoyable hearing other points of view!
I’ll pray that we all become brothers and sisters in the Lord. May God guide all of us to Himself.
Thank you!
Susanne
No offense taken here! My goodness – this was an incredibly civil discussion, and the truth is that there is so much more that any one of us could say and yet we are holding back so as to NOT hurt each other. If we did not have good will toward the other side, we would not even care to explain or discuss. I realize that no one is trying to convert me – nor am I trying to convert anyone. As has already been said – only God can bring about this change. A faithful Christian will issue a call, and so will a faithful Muslim. It is up to the hearer to decide what is true.
I do hope to blog on who I believe the real Jesus to be – sometime within the next week if time permits. Perhaps the discussion can continue on that level at that time. I promise straight talk and not just warm fuzzies, cousin Umm Adam. (LOL.)
And yet – for here and now – I leave you with warm fuzzies of peace.
Everyone,
I just wanted to say that I think everyone who has been involved in the discussion on UmmAdam’s blog have done very well in their efforts to explain their points of view in a charitable manner. I’ve seen similar discussions devolve into vitriol and hate in very, very short order.
The people who are likely to discuss their faith with others, on blogs or anywhere, are usually the people who are passionate about their faith, and that passion can sometimes make it hard to always come across in a polite manner, especially over the internet, where tone of voice and facial expressions are non-existant.
I love to learn, I love to hear other peoples points of view on anything and everything, and try to understand it, especially when it’s so very different from what I know. And it’s places like this that help that be possible, even if there may be some bumps along the way. We’re all only human, and doing our best. So I just wanted to thank UmmAdam for letting us use her blog in this way, and everyone who’s been participating in the discussions. They’ve been fascinating, and educational, at least for me.
-Amber
Ok, everybody. Thanks for your posts. I feel better
Ummadam, you said: “I have noticed that Christians like to make everyone feel warm and fuzzy, this is what I would consider manipulative. I want the truth told to me.”
I can assure you that the church I’m going to lost a LOT of potential converts by saying the truth to them, even if those people were warmly welcome.
The truth is the truth!
Have a good day, you all.
Also I want to add that English is not my first language so sometimes I might miss a subtility (or lack of subtility myself in my writings, which is frustrating when tryung to explain the mysteries of God!))
I have had this conversation with my wife. It is important to note that although most Christians believe in the trinity and the divinity of Jesus, not all do.
I have met Christians who have been very clear that they think the concept of the trinity is a fiction and that Jesus was just a prophet and in no way any part of a triune god.
I think these Christians, a small minority they might be, are representive of what was probably the largest section of early Christians.
Probably a majority of early Christians did not believe in the trinity and the divinity of Jesus. Unfortunately, those that did have these beliefs were able to slaughter those Christians who did.
It was the sword that causes the trinity and diety of Jesus to become standard Christian beliefs, not the force of religious argument and proofs.
Comment removed. I have never banned anyone from my blog, but if this happens again you will be banned. I knew you hated the sunnah but this comment leads me to believe you are a Shite. Muslims would never curse a companion of the Prophet (peace be upon him), may Allah be pleased with them.
Abid: Why would Allaah curse Mu’aawiyah?
Who said Allaah cursed Mu’awiyyah!?! Name your men!!!
Intisar, please let his comment stay, so that the truth of the matter may be exposed. Perhaps he or others who hold the same view may be guided to what’s correct.
Umm Adam, I haven’t seen the comment but I do hope you keep it removed insha’Allah. Sister Asiya Abdullah is right in one respect may Allah bless her but I believe this is not the place for discussing such matters and it really takes more then just the “no, you’re wrong..” type of answer. Unless someone here is expert in the science of hadeeth, good at refuting without turning it into an argument due to anger (which I hope those who feel it get rewarded for), then I suggest not bringing the comment back! *Smile*
Asiya, too late – it’s gone.
Dalioness, alhamduillah you were saved from seeing it.
He goes by the name Abid Hasan that should tell you all you need to know. it’s one thing for me to discuss Islam with Christians – that usually don’t know much about Islam. However, Shia do and many have dedicated their life to antagonizing Muslims and slandering the companions of the Prophet.
They can all go to hell as far as I am concerned.
Yeah, I know what you mean. I could sort of tell from the comments which followed, what his comment was all about. May Allah guide him.
Bismillah.
*smile* @ Emma. Glad it’s all sorted. We (including moi!) can misunderstand how other people intend things in blogland. Part and parcel of cyber-discussions. What’s your background (native tongue)?
Dalioness, your advice is graciously accepted, and I pray Allaah rewards you with good in this life and the hereafter, ameen. BTW, what ever happened to your blog? I was liking it a lot!!!
In any case you’re right in general, but personally I think that showing a Shia the truth is no different than showing a non-Muslim the truth. If you have the evidence and the correct understanding, then it’s simple, you have the evidence and the correct understanding and can therefore share it with others. I personally did not comment on the recent discussion about Islam/Christianity because while I do know that anything other than Islam is false, I have never delved into Christianity so much that I could refute every point as Umm Adam has so wonderfully done mashaa Allaah! Sure, it only takes logical thinking ot refute Christian beliefs, but that’s something I did a long time ago, and alhamdu lillaah I’ve never had to revisit it…I’m firm and unshaken in my beliefs alhamdu lillaah. I have however been studying Aqeedah recently and the belief that we do not speak ill of the companions, as well as the evidences to support said belief is fresh in my mind alhamdu lillaah. And all I wanted to do was share it with Abid and anyone else who might have the wrong set of beliefs.
Assalamu alayki Asiya,
Aww, sorry if I seemed…..dunno. Lol.
In any case, sure, if you are equiped with knowledge go for it, this is why I said “unless someone here is expert in the science of hadith…”. Because I truly believe, based on what I have seen in the past, that one must first establish unshakeable evidence (easy to do text wise, but the Shia are known for refusing) that the Sunnah is “Wahy”, then one must be knowledgeable in riwayah, since believe me, the Shiite are VERY familiar with our ahadeeth and narrators, in fact so much so that they make it their sole preocupation to dig up and cast doubt on ahadeeth, of course with the sole intention to attack sahaba (and sahabiyat, the Prophets’ wives…). I have seen numerous ahadeeth which they bring up and if one is not well versed, doesn’t know the history very well, doesn’t know particular incidents which the ahadeeth are related to, then it is easy for a person (in this case many of this blogs’ readers I’m assuming, including myself) to fall into doubts. Thus I do not believe that knowing aqeedah alone is enough (and I am saying that humbly sis), seerah, historical events etc are extremely important as well specifically when talking about the sahaba and the incidents which the Shiite looooooove to twist.
Anyway, my opinion is just one out of mere precaution, but sure sis, I wouldn’t attempt to stop anyone who is good at refuting them based on sound evidence and with hikmah, so if you have what it takes then of course by all means, may Allah reward you for it.
As for discussing on an open blog with the Christians, again, in my humble opinion, we were only discussing the very basic of our religions, the concept of God, this is insha’Allah clear to every Muslim so there is no danger of falling into doubts, wallahu A’lam. But as for the Shiite, then I feel there is, because believe me, they are experts when it comes down to lying, misquoting, twisting facts etc. All out of their hatred for the sahaba and the Sunnah.
May Allah reward you ukhti and I’m sorry if I seemed offensive or *Ms. Know-it-all*.
Aliyah:
I’m french speaking.
Wa alayki salaam sister Dalioness, you didn’t seem like a Miss Know it all at all! Mashaa Allaah you brought up some good points here and I actually do NOT have adequate knowledge of seerah, history, and hadeeth. So Jazakillaahu khayran for pointing that out! I see now that it’s more than just saying “well this is what the salaf were on, and this is how the salaf dealt with it…” because if that is not one’s methodology, then it just like goes in one ear and out the other….then there’s the fact that they (Shia) have their OWN salaf, so to speak….yes, I’ll definitely stay out of this one and leave it to those with knowledge!
It is in the basics of the correct Islaamic Aqeedah, specifically in their violation of Tawheed, where you find that the raafidah shi’a are mushriks (polytheists). They have many groups, and the worst of them are the Ash’aari Twelvers who are also their largest sect. Sixty percent of the shi’a worldwide are Twelvers. Iran is full of them and so is Iraq. That’s why Shaykh Abdul Azziz Aali Shaykh said Iran were kuffar. There are mountains of refutations against them by the ALL the scholars of Islaaam; past and present, declaring most of their numerous groups kuffar!!! There does exist a group or two who simply believe that Ali should have been the khalifah i.e. the Zaydees, but at the very least they are astray from the beliefs of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’aat. Some of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah who were once Zaydees, like As Shawkanee and Muqbil (rahimahumullaah)and warned against them.
Incidentally, the Twelvers hooked up with the zaydees in Yemen, turning them violent; after which they rebelled against the government and are in the midst of a civil war.
The shi’a are clear in their objectives: they hate ahlus Sunnah and they want to over take control of the Ummah. Mean while, sooooo many of the people who ascribe themselves to the Sunnah are confused in their Religion, and in our times, go around calling the Shi’a our “brothers” in Islaam. This is false; they are kuffar!!! The Sunnis in Iraq used to go around calling the raafidah their brothers, and intermarrying with them. As soon as they got the opportunity i.e. the Iraq war, they turned on them and massacred them. This still is going on today. In the annals of Islaamic history, you will find the shi’a always proved treacherous to the Muslims.
what was the point of your comment bro Daud?
You said…
“Thus I do not believe that knowing aqeedah alone is enough (and I am saying that humbly sis), seerah, historical events etc are extremely important as well specifically when talking about the sahaba and the incidents which the Shiite looooooove to twist.
…and Asiyah said…
“…then there’s the fact that they (Shia) have their OWN salaf, so to speak….yes, I’ll definitely stay out of this one and leave it to those with knowledge!”
…So I pointed out some information about the Shi’a ; mainly that you don’t have to delve deeply into Aqeedah to understand they are kuffar. They do more than curse the Sahaabah (radiyyallaahu anhum) You can detect the shirk and kufr of the raafidah shi’a at the most fundamental level of aqeedah; which is Tawheed. They violate Tawheed in the same manner as the christians.
Ok bro Daud, I see what you’re saying. But it really has nothing to do with what I objected to. Their kufr is obvious, and I said nothing in opposition. I did not say one has to “delve deeply” into anything, and it is clear to me that they are kuffar. If you read my posts again, I was saying one needs to have knowledge beyond the basic aqeedah in order to refute them. The other aspect of it is wisdom, so I did not think it wise to discuss such matters on a blog like this, for numerous reasons.
Read my comments again please if the point of my comments was not clear for you.
Here’s a question…why Dawaah and point out the false beliefs of religions, trying to win reverts, if the Qur’an explicitly says that eventually all men will go to paradise?